Gurecki v. Sallwasser
This text of 146 N.E.2d 827 (Gurecki v. Sallwasser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petitioner seeks a Writ of Mandamus against the respondent Judge. The action is not prosecuted in the name of the State of Indiana on the relation of the party seeking the relief. The petition does not comply with Rule 2-35, which requires certified copies of all court orders pertaining to the subject matter be filed with the petition.
A showing has been made that the respondent against whom this petition is filed has refused to accept and has never accepted the appointment as special judge and that the regular judge has submitted the names of three persons to the parties from whom a special judge is to be chosen.
For the reasons stated the petition is denied.
Note. — Reported in 146 N. E. 2d 827.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
146 N.E.2d 827, 237 Ind. 706, 1958 Ind. LEXIS 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gurecki-v-sallwasser-ind-1958.