Gurecki v. Gurecki

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gurecki v. Gurecki

92 A.D.2d 606, 459 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16865

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 28, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 92 A.D.2d 606 (Gurecki v. Gurecki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gurecki v. Gurecki, 92 A.D.2d 606, 459 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16865 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover daniages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Collins, J.), dated December 28, 1981, which was in the principal sum of only $13,500, upon a jury verdict. Judgment reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs, and new trial granted as to damages only. The trial court erred in refusing to permit plaintiffs’ expert to testify as to the permanency of the infant’s psychological injuries. The bill of particulars adequately set forth these injuries (see Damon Runyon Mem. Fund for Cancer Research v Service Contr. Co., 34 AD2d 904). Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Thompson and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover daniages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Collins, J.), dated December 28, 1981, which was in the principal sum of only $13,500, upon a jury verdict. Judgment reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs, and new trial granted as to damages only. The trial court erred in refusing to permit plaintiffs’ expert to testify as to the permanency of the infant’s psychological injuries. The bill of particulars adequately set forth these injuries (see Damon Runyon Mem. Fund for Cancer Research v Service Contr. Co., 34 AD2d 904). Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Thompson and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 A.D.2d 606, 459 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gurecki-v-gurecki-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack