Gural v. Drasner
50 N.E.3d 915, 27 N.Y.3d 973, 31 N.Y.S.3d 448, 2016 NY Slip Op 69218, 2016 WL 1312919, 2016 N.Y. LEXIS 770
This text of 50 N.E.3d 915 (Gural v. Drasner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gural v. Drasner, 50 N.E.3d 915, 27 N.Y.3d 973, 31 N.Y.S.3d 448, 2016 NY Slip Op 69218, 2016 WL 1312919, 2016 N.Y. LEXIS 770 (N.Y. 2016).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Appellate Division order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution and that the stipulation does not qualify as a final judgment within the meaning of CPLR 5602 (a) (1) (ii) to bring up for review a prior nonfinal Appellate Division order because it was entered into without prejudice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
50 N.E.3d 915, 27 N.Y.3d 973, 31 N.Y.S.3d 448, 2016 NY Slip Op 69218, 2016 WL 1312919, 2016 N.Y. LEXIS 770, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gural-v-drasner-ny-2016.