Gupta v. New York State Department of Social Services

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gupta v. New York State Department of Social Services

208 A.D.2d 629, 617 N.Y.S.2d 367

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 11, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 208 A.D.2d 629 (Gupta v. New York State Department of Social Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gupta v. New York State Department of Social Services, 208 A.D.2d 629, 617 N.Y.S.2d 367 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent New York State Department of Social Services, dated March 25, 1992, which, after a hearing, excluded the petitioner from participating in the Medical Assistance Program for a period of two years.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, and the petition is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The New York State Department of Social Services (hereinafter the Department) proffered substantial evidence that the petitioner, a dentist and a duly enrolled Medicaid provider, on numerous occasions failed to schedule medically required follow-up appointments with his patients. Accordingly, the Department’s determination that the petitioner had failed to meet professionally recognized standards for health care in violation of 18 NYCRR 515.2 (b) (12), must be confirmed (see, Matter of Hunter v New York City Bd. of Educ., 190 AD2d 851).

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, due process of law and the concept of a fair administrative hearing do not require that the actual taking of evidence be before the same Hearing Officer who makes the final determination (see, Matter of Rothkoff v Ratner, 104 Misc 2d 204, 205-206; see also, State Administrative Procedure Act § 303).

Finally, we have reviewed the petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit (see, Matter of Block v Ambach, 73 NY2d 323; Matter of Mercy Hosp. v New York State Dept. of Social Servs., 79 NY2d 197, 207). Mangano, P. J., Thompson, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent New York State Department of Social Services, dated March 25, 1992, which, after a hearing, excluded the petitioner from participating in the Medical Assistance Program for a period of two years.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, and the petition is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The New York State Department of Social Services (hereinafter the Department) proffered substantial evidence that the petitioner, a dentist and a duly enrolled Medicaid provider, on numerous occasions failed to schedule medically required follow-up appointments with his patients. Accordingly, the Department’s determination that the petitioner had failed to meet professionally recognized standards for health care in violation of 18 NYCRR 515.2 (b) (12), must be confirmed (see, Matter of Hunter v New York City Bd. of Educ., 190 AD2d 851).

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, due process of law and the concept of a fair administrative hearing do not require that the actual taking of evidence be before the same Hearing Officer who makes the final determination (see, Matter of Rothkoff v Ratner, 104 Misc 2d 204, 205-206; see also, State Administrative Procedure Act § 303).

Finally, we have reviewed the petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit (see, Matter of Block v Ambach, 73 NY2d 323; Matter of Mercy Hosp. v New York State Dept. of Social Servs., 79 NY2d 197, 207). Mangano, P. J., Thompson, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

208 A.D.2d 629, 617 N.Y.S.2d 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gupta-v-new-york-state-department-of-social-services-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack