Gupta v. Great Northern Insurance
This text of 353 F. App'x 562 (Gupta v. Great Northern Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiffs-appellants Anuj and Dina Gupta (“plaintiffs”) appeal from the February 10, 2009 judgment of the District Court granting the motion to dismiss of defendant-appellee Great Northern Insurance Company (“Great Northern”). On appeal plaintiffs argue that the District Court erred in concluding that the insurance policy issued to plaintiffs by Great Northern unambiguously excluded coverage of the automobile accident at issue in this case. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and procedural history of the case.
We have reviewed plaintiffs’ claim and find it to be without merit. Substantially for the reasons stated in the February 6, 2009, 2009 WL 291011, ruling of the District Court, the February 10, 2009 judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
353 F. App'x 562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gupta-v-great-northern-insurance-ca2-2009.