Guppy v. Brown

4 U.S. 410, 11 F. Cas. 117, 1 L. Ed. 887, 4 Dall. 410, 1805 U.S. LEXIS 278
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 1, 1805
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 4 U.S. 410 (Guppy v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Guppy v. Brown, 4 U.S. 410, 11 F. Cas. 117, 1 L. Ed. 887, 4 Dall. 410, 1805 U.S. LEXIS 278 (1805).

Opinion

4 U.S. 410 (____)
4 Dall. 410

Guppy et al.
versus
Brown.

Supreme Court of United States.

*411 Ingersoll, and Tod, for the plaintiffs.

Franklin, and Dallas, for the defendant.

By the COURT:

The objection is fatal. The commissioners do not derive their authority from the parties, but from the Court; and as it is a special authority, it must be strictly pursued. The power given to four, cannot be well executed by three, commissioners.

The evidence over-ruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Specht v. City of New York
15 F.4th 594 (Second Circuit, 2021)
Moore v. Keesey
173 P.2d 130 (Washington Supreme Court, 1946)
Patterson v. Leavitt
4 Conn. 50 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1821)
Snapp and Others v. Alexander Moore
2 Tenn. 236 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1814)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 U.S. 410, 11 F. Cas. 117, 1 L. Ed. 887, 4 Dall. 410, 1805 U.S. LEXIS 278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guppy-v-brown-scotus-1805.