Guppy v. Brown
4 U.S. 410, 11 F. Cas. 117, 1 L. Ed. 887, 4 Dall. 410, 1805 U.S. LEXIS 278
Opinion
Guppy et al.
versus
Brown.
Supreme Court of United States.
*411 Ingersoll, and Tod, for the plaintiffs.
Franklin, and Dallas, for the defendant.
By the COURT:
The objection is fatal. The commissioners do not derive their authority from the parties, but from the Court; and as it is a special authority, it must be strictly pursued. The power given to four, cannot be well executed by three, commissioners.
The evidence over-ruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Guppy v. Brown, 4 U.S. 410, 11 F. Cas. 117, 1 L. Ed. 887, 4 Dall. 410, 1805 U.S. LEXIS 278 (1805).
4 U.S. 410 (Guppy v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
The Promenade D'Iberville, LLC v. Jacksonville Electric Authority
Mississippi Supreme Court, 2025
Burgess Jr. v. Westlake Financial
D. Nevada, 2024
Specht v. City of New York
15 F.4th 594 (Second Circuit, 2021)
Moore v. Keesey
173 P.2d 130 (Washington Supreme Court, 1946)
Patterson v. Leavitt
4 Conn. 50 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1821)
Snapp and Others v. Alexander Moore
2 Tenn. 236 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1814)