Guodoy Arana v. Decker
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------x
MERCEDES GUODOY ARANA,
Petitioner,
-v- No. 20 CV 4104-LTS
THOMAS DECKER, et al.,
Respondents.
-------------------------------------------------------x
ORDER
The Court has received the Government’s supplemental submission in response to Petitioner’s letter dated October 28, 2020, regarding the applicability of the Second Circuit’s recent decision in Velasco Lopez v. Decker, -- F.3d --, 2020 WL 6278204 (2d Cir. Oct. 27, 2020), to Petitioner’s pending habeas petition. (See docket entry nos. 1, 13, 15.) Counsel for Petitioner is directed to file a response to the Government’s contention that Petitioner’s detention has not been unduly prolonged sufficiently to warrant a new bond hearing with a shifted burden. The response must be filed by November 10, 2020.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: New York, New York November 2, 2020
/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Guodoy Arana v. Decker (Guodoy Arana v. Decker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.