Guntzer v. County of Westchester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Guntzer v. County of Westchester

273 A.D. 902, 78 N.Y.S.2d 70, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5206

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 8, 1948

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 273 A.D. 902 (Guntzer v. County of Westchester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Guntzer v. County of Westchester, 273 A.D. 902, 78 N.Y.S.2d 70, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5206 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action against the county of Westchester to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff, order of the County Court, Westchester County, granting plaintiff’s motion to extend her time to serve a complaint and denying defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the action, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. (See Civ. Prae. Act, §§ 16, 17, 218; Liberty Bank of Buffalo v. City of Buffalo, 241 App. Div. 323, 324; Friederiehsen v. Benard, 247 IT. S. 207.) Lewis, P. J., Carswell and Johnston, JJ., concur; Adel and Wenzel, JJ., -dissent and vote to reverse the order, to deny plaintiff’s motion and to grant defendant’s cross motion on the authority of Harriss v. Tams (258 N. Y. 229) and Liberty Bank of Buffalo v. City of Buffalo (241 App. Div. 323). [See post pp. 966, 1008.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action against the county of Westchester to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff, order of the County Court, Westchester County, granting plaintiff’s motion to extend her time to serve a complaint and denying defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the action, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. (See Civ. Prae. Act, §§ 16, 17, 218; Liberty Bank of Buffalo v. City of Buffalo, 241 App. Div. 323, 324; Friederiehsen v. Benard, 247 IT. S. 207.) Lewis, P. J., Carswell and Johnston, JJ., concur; Adel and Wenzel, JJ., -dissent and vote to reverse the order, to deny plaintiff’s motion and to grant defendant’s cross motion on the authority of Harriss v. Tams (258 N. Y. 229) and Liberty Bank of Buffalo v. City of Buffalo (241 App. Div. 323). [See post pp. 966, 1008.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 A.D. 902, 78 N.Y.S.2d 70, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guntzer-v-county-of-westchester-nyappdiv-1948.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack