Gunthrope-Hardee v. Dormitory Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gunthrope-Hardee v. Dormitory Authority

41 A.D.3d 144, 835 N.Y.S.2d 898

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 7, 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 41 A.D.3d 144 (Gunthrope-Hardee v. Dormitory Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gunthrope-Hardee v. Dormitory Authority, 41 A.D.3d 144, 835 N.Y.S.2d 898 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William A. Wetzel, J.), entered October 12, 2006, denying the petition brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 seeking to annul respondent Dormitory Authority’s authorization of bonds to refinance respondent Teachers College’s debt, and granting respondents’ cross motion to dismiss this article 78 proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The provision in 6 NYCRR 617.5 (c) (23) that “refinancing existing debt” is not subject to review under the State Environmental Quality Review Act is neither unreasonable nor irrational (see Matter of City Council of City of Watervliet v Town Bd. of Town of Colonie, 3 NY3d 508, 518 [2004]). Nor does Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Law § 14.09 apply to the refinancing of preexisting debt (see Matter of Committee To Save Washington Sq. v Dormitory Auth. of State of NY., 281 AD2d 770, 772 [2001]). Concur—Tom, J.P. Saxe, Marlow, Sullivan and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William A. Wetzel, J.), entered October 12, 2006, denying the petition brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 seeking to annul respondent Dormitory Authority’s authorization of bonds to refinance respondent Teachers College’s debt, and granting respondents’ cross motion to dismiss this article 78 proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The provision in 6 NYCRR 617.5 (c) (23) that “refinancing existing debt” is not subject to review under the State Environmental Quality Review Act is neither unreasonable nor irrational (see Matter of City Council of City of Watervliet v Town Bd. of Town of Colonie, 3 NY3d 508, 518 [2004]). Nor does Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Law § 14.09 apply to the refinancing of preexisting debt (see Matter of Committee To Save Washington Sq. v Dormitory Auth. of State of NY., 281 AD2d 770, 772 [2001]). Concur—Tom, J.P. Saxe, Marlow, Sullivan and Williams, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 A.D.3d 144, 835 N.Y.S.2d 898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gunthrope-hardee-v-dormitory-authority-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack