Gunther v. Roaman's Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gunther v. Roaman's Inc.

26 A.D.2d 811, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3326

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 20, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 26 A.D.2d 811 (Gunther v. Roaman's Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gunther v. Roaman's Inc., 26 A.D.2d 811, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3326 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, entered June 14, 1966, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, without costs or disbursements to either party, so as to give the defendant an opportunity to appear for further examination, and as so modified the order is affirmed. Such examination shall be held within 10 days from the date of the service of the copy of the order of this court, with notice of entry thereof. In view of the uncertainty with respect to which report was to be produced and how it was to be used, defendant should be given a further opportunity to comply with the order of Special Term. Settle order on notice. Concur—• Botein, P. J., Rabin, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, entered June 14, 1966, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, without costs or disbursements to either party, so as to give the defendant an opportunity to appear for further examination, and as so modified the order is affirmed. Such examination shall be held within 10 days from the date of the service of the copy of the order of this court, with notice of entry thereof. In view of the uncertainty with respect to which report was to be produced and how it was to be used, defendant should be given a further opportunity to comply with the order of Special Term. Settle order on notice. Concur—• Botein, P. J., Rabin, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.2d 811, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gunther-v-roamans-inc-nyappdiv-1966.