Gunter v. Tullot

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Gunter v. Tullot

389 S.E.2d 338, 193 Ga. App. 880, 1989 Ga. App. LEXIS 1671

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 30, 1989

DocketA89A0836

StatusPublished

This text of 389 S.E.2d 338 (Gunter v. Tullot) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gunter v. Tullot, 389 S.E.2d 338, 193 Ga. App. 880, 1989 Ga. App. LEXIS 1671 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinions

Benham, Judge.

Appellant and appellee were involved in a motor vehicle collision in which both parties sustained injuries. Appellee filed suit against appellant, and a jury found in favor of appellee, awarding her $32,000. Appellant brings this appeal, contending the trial court erred by al[881]*881lowing harmful and prejudicial closing argument by appellee’s attorney to go unchecked.

Inasmuch as the parties did not arrange for the takedown of the closing arguments, the record does not contain a transcript of the offending remarks or the objection made thereto. Although we do not have a transcript or a supplement thereto (see OCGA § 5-6-41 (c)), the trial court made a finding of fact concerning the issue at the hearing on the motion for new trial. The trial court recalled that appellee’s attorney had stated in his closing argument that “[appellant] was out there drunk on the street.” While the trial court’s finding presents to this court the offending remark, the record is still devoid of appellant’s objection to the statement. “When allegedly improper argument is made to the jury, opposing counsel must object at trial or otherwise invoke a ruling of the trial court. Failure so to object constitutes waiver. [Cits.]” Verde v. Granary Enterprises, 178 Ga. App. 773 (5) (345 SE2d 56) (1986). Since “[t]he burden is on the party asserting error to show it affirmatively .by the record [cit.]” (Ragan v. Smith, 188 Ga. App. 770 (2) (374 SE2d 559) (1988) (emphasis supplied)), and the record contains no such showing, we must presume the trial court took the proper action. See Smith v. Manley, 96 Ga. App. 158, 161 (99 SE2d 534) (1957). See also Wright v. Wright, 170 Ga. App. 652 (3) (317 SE2d 888) (1984).

Judgment affirmed.

Birdsong, J., concurs. Deen, P. J., concurs specially.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Benham, Judge.

Appellant and appellee were involved in a motor vehicle collision in which both parties sustained injuries. Appellee filed suit against appellant, and a jury found in favor of appellee, awarding her $32,000. Appellant brings this appeal, contending the trial court erred by al[881]*881lowing harmful and prejudicial closing argument by appellee’s attorney to go unchecked.

Inasmuch as the parties did not arrange for the takedown of the closing arguments, the record does not contain a transcript of the offending remarks or the objection made thereto. Although we do not have a transcript or a supplement thereto (see OCGA § 5-6-41 (c)), the trial court made a finding of fact concerning the issue at the hearing on the motion for new trial. The trial court recalled that appellee’s attorney had stated in his closing argument that “[appellant] was out there drunk on the street.” While the trial court’s finding presents to this court the offending remark, the record is still devoid of appellant’s objection to the statement. “When allegedly improper argument is made to the jury, opposing counsel must object at trial or otherwise invoke a ruling of the trial court. Failure so to object constitutes waiver. [Cits.]” Verde v. Granary Enterprises, 178 Ga. App. 773 (5) (345 SE2d 56) (1986). Since “[t]he burden is on the party asserting error to show it affirmatively .by the record [cit.]” (Ragan v. Smith, 188 Ga. App. 770 (2) (374 SE2d 559) (1988) (emphasis supplied)), and the record contains no such showing, we must presume the trial court took the proper action. See Smith v. Manley, 96 Ga. App. 158, 161 (99 SE2d 534) (1957). See also Wright v. Wright, 170 Ga. App. 652 (3) (317 SE2d 888) (1984).

Judgment affirmed.

Birdsong, J., concurs. Deen, P. J., concurs specially.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

389 S.E.2d 338, 193 Ga. App. 880, 1989 Ga. App. LEXIS 1671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gunter-v-tullot-gactapp-1989.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack