Gunter v. State
94 S.W.2d 747, 130 Tex. Crim. 488, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 299
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 26, 1936·No. No. 17971.·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinions
The offense is theft of cattle; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.
The recognizance appearing in the record is defective in that it fails to state the names of the sureties. Luman v. State, 20 S. W. (2d) 1064.
The appeal is dismissed.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gunter v. State, 94 S.W.2d 747, 130 Tex. Crim. 488, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 299 (Tex. 1936).
94 S.W.2d 747 (Gunter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thompson v. State
339 S.W.2d 209 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)