Gunter v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Gunter v. State

146 S.W. 542, 66 Tex. Crim. 291, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 234

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 17, 1912·No. No. 1684.·Published

Opinion

HARPER, Judge.

The recognizance in this case is fatally defective in that it does not show that defendant has been convicted of any offense; what punishment, if any was assessed against him, and is defective in other particulars. The Assistant Attorney-General has moved to dismiss the appeal on account of said defects, and the motion is sustained.

In addition to this the bills of exception contained in the record were not filed within the time authorized by the court, and could not be considered, were this case properly before us.

Appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARPER, Judge.

The recognizance in this case is fatally defective in that it does not show that defendant has been convicted of any offense; what punishment, if any was assessed against him, and is defective in other particulars. The Assistant Attorney-General has moved to dismiss the appeal on account of said defects, and the motion is sustained.

In addition to this the bills of exception contained in the record were not filed within the time authorized by the court, and could not be considered, were this case properly before us.

Appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Gunter v. State, 146 S.W. 542, 66 Tex. Crim. 291, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 234 (Tex. 1912).

Pincite

146 S.W. 542 (Gunter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.