Gunter v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Gunter v. State

1917 OK CR 19, 162 P. 231, 13 Okla. Crim. 83, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 21

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 17, 1917

DocketNo. A-2761.

StatusPublished

Cited by13 cases

This text of 1917 OK CR 19 (Gunter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gunter v. State, 1917 OK CR 19, 162 P. 231, 13 Okla. Crim. 83, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 21 (Okla. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

DOYLE, P. J.

The plaintiff in error, Ed Gunter, was convicted' in the county court of Okmulgee county on a charge of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, and on the 15th day of February, 1916, he was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 60 days and to. pay a fine of $100, and $55 costs, and, in default of payment of said fine and costs, that he be further confined until the same is satisfied as by law provided. To reverse ihe judgment an appeal was attempted to be taken by *84 filing in this court on June 14, 1916, a petition in error with case-made.

The Attorney General has -filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the same was not taken within the time provided by law; that the statutory 60-days expired on the 16th day of April, 1916, and, no order of court extending the time to appeal having been granted, the appeal should be dismissed because this court has not acquired jurisdiction to hear the appeal.

Our Procedure Criminal provides that:

“In misdemeanor cases the appeal must be taken within sixty days after the judgment is rendered; provided, however, that the trial court or judge may, for good cause shown, extend the time in which such appeal may be taken not exceeding sixty days.” (Section 5991, Rev. Laws 1910.)

No answer or response to the motion to dismiss mis been filed, and a careful examination of the case-made fails to disclose that the trial court or judge made any order extending the time in which to perfect the appeal. It is the uniform holding of this court that the appeal must be perfected within the time prescribed by the statute, otherwise this court does not acquire jurisdiction to review the judgment. Krivanek v. State, 11 Okla. Cr. 172, 144 Pac. 188.

It follows that the motion to dismiss must be sustained. The purported appeal is therefore dismissed, and the cause remanded to the trial court, with direction to enforce its judgment therein.

ARMSTRONG and BRETT, JJ.,- concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOYLE, P. J.

The plaintiff in error, Ed Gunter, was convicted' in the county court of Okmulgee county on a charge of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, and on the 15th day of February, 1916, he was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 60 days and to. pay a fine of $100, and $55 costs, and, in default of payment of said fine and costs, that he be further confined until the same is satisfied as by law provided. To reverse ihe judgment an appeal was attempted to be taken by *84 filing in this court on June 14, 1916, a petition in error with case-made.

The Attorney General has -filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the same was not taken within the time provided by law; that the statutory 60-days expired on the 16th day of April, 1916, and, no order of court extending the time to appeal having been granted, the appeal should be dismissed because this court has not acquired jurisdiction to hear the appeal.

Our Procedure Criminal provides that:

“In misdemeanor cases the appeal must be taken within sixty days after the judgment is rendered; provided, however, that the trial court or judge may, for good cause shown, extend the time in which such appeal may be taken not exceeding sixty days.” (Section 5991, Rev. Laws 1910.)

No answer or response to the motion to dismiss mis been filed, and a careful examination of the case-made fails to disclose that the trial court or judge made any order extending the time in which to perfect the appeal. It is the uniform holding of this court that the appeal must be perfected within the time prescribed by the statute, otherwise this court does not acquire jurisdiction to review the judgment. Krivanek v. State, 11 Okla. Cr. 172, 144 Pac. 188.

It follows that the motion to dismiss must be sustained. The purported appeal is therefore dismissed, and the cause remanded to the trial court, with direction to enforce its judgment therein.

ARMSTRONG and BRETT, JJ.,- concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1917 OK CR 19, 162 P. 231, 13 Okla. Crim. 83, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gunter-v-state-oklacrimapp-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack