Gunter v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Gunter v. State

145 So. 918, 25 Ala. App. 633

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 10, 1933

Docket6 Div. 292.

StatusPublished

This text of 145 So. 918 (Gunter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gunter v. State, 145 So. 918, 25 Ala. App. 633 (Ala. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

This appeal is from a judgment of conviction for violating the state prohibition law. The defendant was duly sentenced to hard labor for the county for 175 days, and, it being made known to the trial court that this was his second conviction for a similar offense, the court added 4 months’ extra hard labor.

The appeal here is rested upon the record proper; there being no bill of exceptions. Upon an examination of the record we find it regular and without error. The judgment of conviction in the circuit court is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

This appeal is from a judgment of conviction for violating the state prohibition law. The defendant was duly sentenced to hard labor for the county for 175 days, and, it being made known to the trial court that this was his second conviction for a similar offense, the court added 4 months’ extra hard labor.

The appeal here is rested upon the record proper; there being no bill of exceptions. Upon an examination of the record we find it regular and without error. The judgment of conviction in the circuit court is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

145 So. 918, 25 Ala. App. 633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gunter-v-state-alactapp-1933.