Gunter v. J. E. Latham Co.
Opinion
In the absence of allegations in the complaint showing that defendant had breached its contract with the plaintiff, with respect to the properties described in the contract, the demurrer ore tenus was properly sustained.
The order of the defendant that work on one of the properties described in the contract be discontinued, did not constitute a breach of the contract, which is in writing. No facts are alleged in the complaint which show that such order was made arbitrarily, or with intent to injure the plaintiff. The contract expressly provides that work on the properties should be continued or discontinued in the discretion of the defendant, who had advanced all the money for the purchase and operation of the properties.
The judgment is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
182 S.E. 661 (Gunter v. J. E. Latham Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.