Gunter v. Gunter

55 S.E.2d 81, 230 N.C. 662, 1949 N.C. LEXIS 402
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 28, 1949·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Peb CuRiam.

A mortgage on the locus, executed by plaintiff, was foreclosed. Defendant became the purchaser at the sale. Plaintiff now .seeks to have defendant declared trustee for his use and benefit by reason of a parol agreement entered into by them just prior to the sale. A careful examination of the testimony discloses that the contract of the parties, if made, constitutes nothing more than an oral option to repurchase. It is insufficient to charge defendant as trustee or to impress a trust upon his title. Hence the judgment entered must be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gunter v. Gunter, 55 S.E.2d 81, 230 N.C. 662, 1949 N.C. LEXIS 402 (N.C. 1949).

55 S.E.2d 81 (Gunter v. Gunter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bahadur v. McLean
172 S.E.2d 898 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1970)
Roberson v. Pruden
89 S.E.2d 250 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1955)