Gunter v. Edmonds
This text of 101 S.E. 118 (Gunter v. Edmonds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Equity will not reform a written contract because of mistake on the part of the complaining parties as to the contents of the writing, and because of fraud alleged to have been practiced by the other party in procuring the scrivener who drafted the written contract, and in whom the complaining parties had entire confidence, to omit therefrom a stipulation alleged to have been agreed upon, no fiduciary or confidential relation existing between the parties, and no sufficient excuse appearing why the complaining parties did not read the contract. Weaver v. Roberson, 134 Ga. 149 (67 S. E. 662).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
101 S.E. 118, 149 Ga. 518, 1919 Ga. LEXIS 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gunter-v-edmonds-ga-1919.