Gunter v. Edmonds

101 S.E. 118, 149 Ga. 518, 1919 Ga. LEXIS 307
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 15, 1919·No. No. 1463·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

Equity will not reform a written contract because of mistake on the part of the complaining parties as to the contents of the writing, and because of fraud alleged to have been practiced by the other party in procuring the scrivener who drafted the written contract, and in whom the complaining parties had entire confidence, to omit therefrom a stipulation alleged to have been agreed upon, no fiduciary or confidential relation existing between the parties, and no sufficient excuse appearing why the complaining parties did not read the contract. Weaver v. Roberson, 134 Ga. 149 (67 S. E. 662).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Atkinson, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gunter v. Edmonds, 101 S.E. 118, 149 Ga. 518, 1919 Ga. LEXIS 307 (Ga. 1919).

101 S.E. 118 (Gunter v. Edmonds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walker v. B. E. Robuck, Inc.
93 S.E.2d 178 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1956)
McCommons v. Greene County
184 S.E. 897 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Bentley v. Barlow
173 S.E. 707 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1934)
Mayo Arcade Corporation v. Bonded Floors Co.
41 S.W.2d 1104 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1931)