Gunnels v. State

118 So. 919, 96 Fla. 659

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record and the briefs in this cause have been examined and we think the admission in evidence of State’s Exhibits “H” and “I” was erroneous. It is therefore reversed on authority of Boyett v. State, 116 So. R., 476.

Reversed.

Whiteield, P. J., and Terrell and Bueord, J. J., concur. Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.