Gunnel v. Dade

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Gunnel v. Dade

11 F. Cas. 115, 1 Cranch 427

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedJuly 15, 1807

StatusPublished

This text of 11 F. Cas. 115 (Gunnel v. Dade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gunnel v. Dade, 11 F. Cas. 115, 1 Cranch 427 (circtddc 1807).

Pincite

Opinion

[116]*116THE COURT (nem. con.) instructed the jury that the plaintiff cannot recover in this action unless they should be satisfied, by the evidence, that the plaintiff, before the suit brought, returned or offered to return the negro, or that the defendant had waived such return or offer. And that if the jury should be satisfied, &c., that the bill of sale contained a general warranty of the title under the seal of the defendant, the plaintiff could not recover in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[116]*116THE COURT (nem. con.) instructed the jury that the plaintiff cannot recover in this action unless they should be satisfied, by the evidence, that the plaintiff, before the suit brought, returned or offered to return the negro, or that the defendant had waived such return or offer. And that if the jury should be satisfied, &c., that the bill of sale contained a general warranty of the title under the seal of the defendant, the plaintiff could not recover in this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 F. Cas. 115, 1 Cranch 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gunnel-v-dade-circtddc-1807.