Gunn Vs. Gibson, Jr.
This text of Gunn Vs. Gibson, Jr. (Gunn Vs. Gibson, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
JASON GUNN, No. 79275 Petitioner, vs. THE HONORABLE DAVID S. GIBSON, FILED JR., DISTRICT JUDGE, DEPT. L, Res ondent. AUG 0 8 2019 - 1 A. IMMO, CLER OF r PREME COORT_,. BY DEPL.T? CLERK ORDER DENYING PETITION
This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to dismiss two cases. Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Therefore, without deciding on the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter, see NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(b); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioner[ cardies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
Piektitiy /4.14-A Pickering Hardesty cc: Hon. David S. Gibson, Jr., District Judge Jason Gunn Attorney General/Carson City Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A .400 2
V16,, • 1:‘,11
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gunn Vs. Gibson, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gunn-vs-gibson-jr-nev-2019.