Gunn v. Woolfolk
66 Ga. 682
This text of 66 Ga. 682 (Gunn v. Woolfolk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gunn v. Woolfolk, 66 Ga. 682 (Ga. 1881).
Opinion
The remedy of the defendant in error was complete at law for the reasons set out briefly in the syllabus to this cause. Therefore the grant of this injunction to stay the judgment at law was an interposition of chancery not authorized by law, and it must be reversed.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hamilton v. First National Bank
180 S.E. 840 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1935)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
66 Ga. 682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gunn-v-woolfolk-ga-1881.