Gunn v. Woolfolk
66 Ga. 682
Opinion
The remedy of the defendant in error was complete at law for the reasons set out briefly in the syllabus to this cause. Therefore the grant of this injunction to stay the judgment at law was an interposition of chancery not authorized by law, and it must be reversed.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gunn v. Woolfolk, 66 Ga. 682 (Ga. 1881).
66 Ga. 682 (Gunn v. Woolfolk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hamilton v. First National Bank
180 S.E. 840 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1935)