Gunn v. Union Railroad Company

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Gunn v. Union Railroad Company

52 A. 804, 24 R.I. 174, 1902 R.I. LEXIS 31

DecidedMay 7, 1902

StatusPublished

This text of 52 A. 804 (Gunn v. Union Railroad Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gunn v. Union Railroad Company, 52 A. 804, 24 R.I. 174, 1902 R.I. LEXIS 31 (R.I. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

(1) The plaintiff’s petition for a new trial, on his motion made for a second tifhe in the Common Pleas Division for judgment on the verdict, is not properly before the court. .In this case — 23 R. I. 289 — the same ■ question was heard and determined by the full court, in which the court decided: “The plaintiff’s motion that this Division dismiss the defendant’s petition for a new trial and direct the Common Pleas Division to enter judgment on the verdict of the jury in this action, is denied.”

*175 Charles E. Gorman, for plaintiff. David S. Baker, for defendant.

This very question, having been once heard and determined, cannot be brought a second time as a ground for a new trial. Petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

(1) The plaintiff’s petition for a new trial, on his motion made for a second tifhe in the Common Pleas Division for judgment on the verdict, is not properly before the court. .In this case — 23 R. I. 289 — the same ■ question was heard and determined by the full court, in which the court decided: “The plaintiff’s motion that this Division dismiss the defendant’s petition for a new trial and direct the Common Pleas Division to enter judgment on the verdict of the jury in this action, is denied.”

*175 Charles E. Gorman, for plaintiff. David S. Baker, for defendant.

This very question, having been once heard and determined, cannot be brought a second time as a ground for a new trial. Petition dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 A. 804, 24 R.I. 174, 1902 R.I. LEXIS 31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gunn-v-union-railroad-company-ri-1902.