Gunn v. Toia
This text of 60 A.D.2d 783 (Gunn v. Toia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Determination unanimously confirmed, without costs. Memo randum: There is substantial evidence in the record to support the determination of respondent Commissioner of Social Services, after a fair hearing, that petitioners had a 1969 Mercury and that this automobile was an available resource not essential to the needs of petitioners and their dependent children. The determination that this resource should have been utilized to reduce the public assistance to petitioners and their children was proper and is confirmed (18 NYCRR 352.11, 352.16, 352.23). (Article 78 proceeding transferred by order of Onondaga Supreme Court.) Present— Marsh, P. J., Moule, Simons, Dillon and Denman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 A.D.2d 783, 400 N.Y.S.2d 648, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gunn-v-toia-nyappdiv-1977.