Gunn v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Gunn v. State

684 S.W.2d 265, 285 Ark. 93, 1985 Ark. LEXIS 1823

DecidedFebruary 25, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 684 S.W.2d 265 (Gunn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gunn v. State, 684 S.W.2d 265, 285 Ark. 93, 1985 Ark. LEXIS 1823 (Ark. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Henry Gunn, Jr., by his attorney, John L. Kearney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.

The motion admits that the record was not timely filed, without fault on the part of the appellant. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to an error on his part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Per Curiam opinion, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Henry Gunn, Jr., by his attorney, John L. Kearney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.

The motion admits that the record was not timely filed, without fault on the part of the appellant. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to an error on his part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Per Curiam opinion, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

684 S.W.2d 265, 285 Ark. 93, 1985 Ark. LEXIS 1823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gunn-v-state-ark-1985.