Gunn v. Janes
This text of 40 Ga. 175 (Gunn v. Janes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
According to the previous rulings of a majority of this Court, the defendant in the judgment did not, by his evidence, make out such a case as entitled him to any equitable relief, under the provisions of the Act of 1868. I concur .in reversing the judgment of the Court below, in this case, on the ground that the second section of the 'Relief Act of 1868, which authorizes the opening and scaling judgments rendered prior to the passage of that Act, is unconstitutional and void.Let the judgment of the Court below be reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
40 Ga. 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gunn-v-janes-ga-1869.