Gunn v. Holley Performance Prods., Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Gunn v. Holley Performance Prods., Inc.

578 S.W.3d 418

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 16, 2019·No. No. ED 106744·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Holley Performance Products, Inc., appeals the judgment entered after a jury trial finding that it was strictly liable for failing to warn of a defect in its product. Ronald Gunn cross-appeals.

We affirm. Because an extended opinion would have no precedential value, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting *419forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Holley Performance Products, Inc., appeals the judgment entered after a jury trial finding that it was strictly liable for failing to warn of a defect in its product. Ronald Gunn cross-appeals.

We affirm. Because an extended opinion would have no precedential value, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting *419forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Gunn v. Holley Performance Prods., Inc., 578 S.W.3d 418 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

578 S.W.3d 418 (Gunn v. Holley Performance Prods., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.