Gunn v. Holley Performance Prods., Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Gunn v. Holley Performance Prods., Inc.

578 S.W.3d 418

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 16, 2019

DocketNo. ED 106744

StatusPublished

This text of 578 S.W.3d 418 (Gunn v. Holley Performance Prods., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gunn v. Holley Performance Prods., Inc., 578 S.W.3d 418 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Holley Performance Products, Inc., appeals the judgment entered after a jury trial finding that it was strictly liable for failing to warn of a defect in its product. Ronald Gunn cross-appeals.

We affirm. Because an extended opinion would have no precedential value, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting *419forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Holley Performance Products, Inc., appeals the judgment entered after a jury trial finding that it was strictly liable for failing to warn of a defect in its product. Ronald Gunn cross-appeals.

We affirm. Because an extended opinion would have no precedential value, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting *419forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

578 S.W.3d 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gunn-v-holley-performance-prods-inc-moctapp-2019.