Gunderson v. Gunderson (Child Custody)

Opinion

Grisham, 128 Nev. „ 289 P.3d 230, 236 (2012) (recognizing that an agreement placed on the record is enforceable). Moreover, the record reflects that appellant was represented by counsel below and we conclude that there was no abuse of discretion as to the award of preliminary fees or subsequent enforcement for payment. See Sargeant v. Sargeant, 88 Nev. 223, 227, 495 P.2d 618, 621 (1972); see also Shydler v. Shydler, 114 Nev. 192, 196, 954 P.2d 37, 39 (1998) (providing that this court reviews district court decisions concerning divorce proceedings for an abuse of discretion). Finally, appellant argues that the district court improperly ordered her to amend her complaint to add the third-party co-owners of a business that was one-half community property. Having reviewed the record and considered appellant's arguments, we conclude that appellant has not established that this procedural development prejudiced her, and thus any error was harmless. NRCP 61; Truckee-Carson Irrigation Dist. v. Wyatt, 84 Nev. 662, 667-68, 448 P.2d 46, 50 (1968) (explaining that the party asserting error bears the burden of proving that prejudice resulted). 1 For the reasons discussed above, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Gibbons

Pickering LAIR111__ Saitta

'Appellant also contends that respondent has not complied with the divorce decree. To the extent appellant seeks enforcement of the divorce decree, that claim should be directed to the district court in the first instance. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A .4ger cc: Hon. Jennifer Elliott, District Judge, Family Court Division Karen Kay Powell Gunderson Jamie Ray Gunderson Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3 (0) 1941A e