Gunder v. State
This text of 867 So. 2d 565 (Gunder v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Lonnie R. GUNDER, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Lonnie R. Gunder, in proper person.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee.
Before FLETCHER, RAMIREZ, and SHEPHERD, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Lonnie R. Gunder appeals from the lower court's denial of relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. We affirm.
The record shows that on September 23, 2003, Gunder pled to possession of cocaine and was sentenced to five years in state prison with credit for time served. The docket indicates that the court gave Gunder a week's furlough, providing that it would mitigate the sentence to 270 days with participation in the Treatment Alternatives to Street Crime [TASC] program upon Gunder's surrender on September 30, 2003. Gunder failed to appear and was taken into custody a month later. Gunder filed a motion to reduce or modify the sentence, claiming that his failure to appear was not willful, and that his plea was actually to the 270 days and TASC. Gunder is incorrect. The record shows that Gunder agreed to a plea of five years with credit for time served, which sentence could have been mitigated by his appearance at the end of the furlough he requested; his failure to appear was unexcused and not de minimis. We therefore affirm Gunder's legal sentence imposed pursuant to his plea.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
867 So. 2d 565, 2004 WL 384455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gunder-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.