Gunder v. 164 East Seventy-second Street Corp.
242 A.D. 602
Opinions
Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Finch, P. J„ Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.; Finch, P. J., dissents as to the first defense to the first cause of action; O’Malley, J., dissents as to the fifth defense to the first cause of action. Dissenting opinion by Finch, P. J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gunder v. 164 East Seventy-second Street Corp., 242 A.D. 602 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).
242 A.D. 602 (Gunder v. 164 East Seventy-second Street Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Degraaf v. . Wyckoff
22 N.E. 1118 (New York Court of Appeals, 1889)