Gundaker v. Ehrgott
58 A. 476, 209 Pa. 284, 1904 Pa. LEXIS 610
Opinion
The questions raised are questions of fact on which we have not been convinced that the court below was in error. The only question that can properly be called one of law was upon the weight of a responsive answer in equity, but as the court found corroborative circumstances in addition to the testimony against the answer we see no error in that respect.
Decree affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gundaker v. Ehrgott, 58 A. 476, 209 Pa. 284, 1904 Pa. LEXIS 610 (Pa. 1904).
58 A. 476 (Gundaker v. Ehrgott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jones v. Weir
66 A. 550 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1907)