Gund v. Cnty. of Trinity

California Supreme Court

Gund v. Cnty. of Trinity

424 P.3d 268, 237 Cal. Rptr. 3d 178

California Supreme Court·Decided August 22, 2018·No. S249792·Published

Opinion

Review is ordered on the court's own motion. The issue to be briefed and argued is limited to the following: Were plaintiffs engaged in active law enforcement and limited to workers' compensation for their injuries ( Lab. Code, § 3366 ) when a deputy sheriff asked them to check on a neighbor who made a 911 call and the officer allegedly misrepresented the potential danger of the situation? For the purposes of briefing and oral argument, plaintiff James Gund et al. is deemed the petitioner in this court. ( Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.520(a)(6).) The request for an order directing depublication of the opinion in the above-entitled appeal is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Review is ordered on the court's own motion. The issue to be briefed and argued is limited to the following: Were plaintiffs engaged in active law enforcement and limited to workers' compensation for their injuries ( Lab. Code, § 3366 ) when a deputy sheriff asked them to check on a neighbor who made a 911 call and the officer allegedly misrepresented the potential danger of the situation? For the purposes of briefing and oral argument, plaintiff James Gund et al. is deemed the petitioner in this court. ( Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.520(a)(6).) The request for an order directing depublication of the opinion in the above-entitled appeal is denied.

Gund v. Cnty. of Trinity, 424 P.3d 268, 237 Cal. Rptr. 3d 178 (Cal. 2018).

Pincite

424 P.3d 268 (Gund v. Cnty. of Trinity) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.