Gund Real Estate Group LLC v. Roam Beyond Inc

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Washington
DecidedFebruary 17, 2023
Docket2:22-cv-01535
StatusUnknown

This text of Gund Real Estate Group LLC v. Roam Beyond Inc (Gund Real Estate Group LLC v. Roam Beyond Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gund Real Estate Group LLC v. Roam Beyond Inc, (W.D. Wash. 2023).

Opinion

THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 GUND REAL ESTATE GROUP LLC, CASE NO. C22-1535-JCC 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 ROAM BEYOND INC., 13 Defendant. 14

15 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment (Dkt. No. 16 13). Defendant was served, (Dkt. No. 6), but has not appeared, and the Clerk has entered default. 17 (See Dkt. No. 12.) 18 “At the default judgment stage, the court presumes all well-pleaded factual allegations 19 related to liability are true.” Curtis v. Illumination Arts, Inc., 33 F. Supp. 3d 1200, 1211 (W.D. 20 Wash. 2014); see TeleVideo Sys., Inc. v. Heidenthal, 826 F.2d 915, 917–18 (9th Cir. 1987). 21 However, factual allegations relating to damages are not taken as true. Curtis, 33 F. Supp. 3d at 22 1211. A “plaintiff is required to prove all damages sought in the complaint, and the court must 23 ensure that the amount of damages is reasonable and demonstrated by the evidence.” Id. 24 Plaintiff presents evidence supporting damages of $3,226,128.85.1 (See Dkt. No. 13). 25

26 1 This includes the outstanding principal, plus interest through the date of judgment, calculated at a per diem rate of $498.16, minus Defendant’s partial payment of $25,000. (Dkt. No. 13 at 3–4.) 1 Moreover, attorney fees may be recoverable when authorized by a contract between the parties. 2 Panoramo Vill. Condo. Owners Ass’n Bd. Of Dirs. V. Allstate Ins. Co., 26 P.3d 910, 917 (Wash. 3 2001).2 Here, the parties’ Amended and Restated Secured Promissory Note states that after any 4 event of default, the substantially prevailing party shall recover all reasonable costs and attorney 5 fees. (Dkt. No. 14-1 at 4.) Plaintiff has provided sufficient documentation to support its request 6 for attorney fees and costs in the amount of $56,187.44. (See Dkt. No. 15.) 7 Plaintiff also asks the Court to order Defendant to deliver to Plaintiff certificates of title 8 for collateral as provided for in the security agreement. (Dkt. No. 13 at 6–7.) Specific 9 performance is proper where “a valid contract exists, a party has or is threatening to breach the 10 contract, the terms of the contract are clear, and the contract is not the product of fraud or 11 unfairness.” Pardee v. Jolly, 182 P.3d 967, 973 (Wash. 2008). Under the terms of the parties’ 12 Amended and Restated Security Agreement, Defendant agreed to deliver any necessary 13 documents, including certificates of title, necessary for the purpose of perfecting the security 14 interest Plaintiff has in the collateral securing Defendant’s debt. (Dkt. No. 14-2 at 3.) Defendant 15 has failed to deliver original certificates of title as required by the security agreement. Because 16 damages would not be an adequate remedy to compensate Plaintiff for the breach of contract, 17 specific performance is appropriate. See Crafts v. Pitts, 162 P.3d 382, 385–86 (Wash. 2007) 18 (specific performance is appropriate where damages cannot adequately compensate a party’s 19 loss). 20 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 21 1. Plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment (Dkt. No. 16) is GRANTED. 22 2. Plaintiffs are awarded $3,226,128.85 in damages and prejudgment interest. 23 Pre-judgment interest is calculated under the terms of the parties’ Amended and Restated 24 Secured Promissory Note. (Dkt. No. 14-1 at 3.) 25 2 When a federal court sits in diversity, state law denying the right to attorney fees or giving a right to them should be followed. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Soc., 421 U.S. 240, 26 259 n.31 (1975). 1 3. Plaintiffs are awarded $56,187.44 in attorney fees and costs incurred in preparing this 2 motion and the motion for default. 3 4. Post-judgment interest will accrue at 4.89% per annum from the date of judgment. 4 5. Defendant is ORDERED to deliver Plaintiff original certificates of title reflecting 5 Plaintiff’s lien on and security interests in the collateral listed in Exhibit A of the 6 parties’ security agreement (Dkt. No. 14-2 at 7–9). 7 8 DATED this 17th day of February 2023. 9 A 10 11 12 John C. Coughenour 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society
421 U.S. 240 (Supreme Court, 1975)
Pardee v. Jolly
182 P.3d 967 (Washington Supreme Court, 2008)
Crafts v. Pitts
162 P.3d 382 (Washington Supreme Court, 2007)
Panorama Village v. Allstate Ins. Co.
26 P.3d 910 (Washington Supreme Court, 2001)
Curtis v. Illumination Arts, Inc.
33 F. Supp. 3d 1200 (W.D. Washington, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gund Real Estate Group LLC v. Roam Beyond Inc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gund-real-estate-group-llc-v-roam-beyond-inc-wawd-2023.