Gun Owners of Am., Inc. v. Merrick B. Garland

2 F.4th 576
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedJune 25, 2021
Docket19-1298
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 2 F.4th 576 (Gun Owners of Am., Inc. v. Merrick B. Garland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gun Owners of Am., Inc. v. Merrick B. Garland, 2 F.4th 576 (6th Cir. 2021).

Opinion

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0144p.06

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA, INC.; GUN OWNERS ┐ FOUNDATION; VIRGINIA CITIZENS DEFENSE LEAGUE; │ MATT WATKINS; TIM HARMSEN; RACHEL MALONE, │ Plaintiffs-Appellants, │ │ > No. 19-1298 GUN OWNERS OF CALIFORNIA, INC., │ Movant, │ │ │ v. │ │ MERRICK B. GARLAND, in his official capacity as │ Attorney General of the United States; UNITED STATES │ DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, │ TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES; MARVIN G. │ RICHARDSON, in his official capacity as Acting │ Director, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and │ Explosives, │ │ Defendants-Appellees. │ ┘

On Petition for Rehearing En Banc United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids. No. 1:18-cv-01429—Paul Lewis Maloney, District Judge.

Decided and Filed: June 25, 2021

Before: SUTTON, Chief Judge; MOORE, COLE, CLAY, GIBBONS, GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE, WHITE, STRANCH, DONALD, THAPAR, BUSH, LARSEN, NALBANDIAN and MURPHY.*

* Judge Readler recused himself from participation in this case. No. 19-1298 Gun Owners of Am., Inc., et al. v. Garland, et al. Page 2

_________________

ORDER _________________

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service has voted for rehearing en banc of this case. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b) provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court are vacated, the mandate is stayed, and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

__________________________________ Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cargill v. Garland
57 F.4th 447 (Fifth Circuit, 2023)
Gun Owners of America, Inc. v. Merrick B. Garland
19 F.4th 890 (Sixth Circuit, 2021)
Doe v. Trump
S.D. Illinois, 2021

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 F.4th 576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gun-owners-of-am-inc-v-merrick-b-garland-ca6-2021.