Gumbs v. Board of Elections

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gumbs v. Board of Elections

143 A.D.2d 235, 532 N.Y.S.2d 44, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8773

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 24, 1988·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating Martin Markowitz as a candidate in the Democratic Party primary election to be held on September 15, 1988, for the public office of New York State Senator in the 21st Senatorial District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Slavin, J.), dated August 11, 1988, which after a hearing, dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We reject the petitioner’s contention that the designating petition must be invalidated because the candidate used the familiar form of his proper first name (see, Matter of Gardner v Mahoney, 123 AD2d 520). We find that there was no showing that the candidate’s use of the name "Marty Markowitz” on the designating petition rather than "Martin Markowitz” was intended to mislead potential signatories.

We have reviewed the petitioner’s contention that he was denied a fair hearing and find it to be without merit. Bracken, J. P., Rubin, Spatt, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating Martin Markowitz as a candidate in the Democratic Party primary election to be held on September 15, 1988, for the public office of New York State Senator in the 21st Senatorial District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Slavin, J.), dated August 11, 1988, which after a hearing, dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We reject the petitioner’s contention that the designating petition must be invalidated because the candidate used the familiar form of his proper first name (see, Matter of Gardner v Mahoney, 123 AD2d 520). We find that there was no showing that the candidate’s use of the name "Marty Markowitz” on the designating petition rather than "Martin Markowitz” was intended to mislead potential signatories.

We have reviewed the petitioner’s contention that he was denied a fair hearing and find it to be without merit. Bracken, J. P., Rubin, Spatt, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Gumbs v. Board of Elections, 143 A.D.2d 235, 532 N.Y.S.2d 44, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8773 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

143 A.D.2d 235 (Gumbs v. Board of Elections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related