Gulotta v. Gulotta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gulotta v. Gulotta

40 A.D.3d 757, 833 N.Y.S.2d 910

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 8, 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 40 A.D.3d 757 (Gulotta v. Gulotta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gulotta v. Gulotta, 40 A.D.3d 757, 833 N.Y.S.2d 910 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Simeone, J.), dated May 8, 2006, as denied his objections to so much of an order of the same court (Livrieri, S. M.), dated March 8, 2006, as, after a hearing, fixed arrears for unreimbursed medical expenses in the principal sum of $471.96.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

[758]*758The Family Court properly determined that the mother was entitled to reimbursement for 80% of the unreimbursed medical expenses she incurred for the children pursuant to the parties’ stipulation of settlement, which was incorporated but not merged into the underlying divorce judgment (see Clark v Clark, 33 AD3d 836 [2006]).

The father’s remaining contentions are without merit. Spolzino, J.P., Krausman, Skelos and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Simeone, J.), dated May 8, 2006, as denied his objections to so much of an order of the same court (Livrieri, S. M.), dated March 8, 2006, as, after a hearing, fixed arrears for unreimbursed medical expenses in the principal sum of $471.96.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

[758]*758The Family Court properly determined that the mother was entitled to reimbursement for 80% of the unreimbursed medical expenses she incurred for the children pursuant to the parties’ stipulation of settlement, which was incorporated but not merged into the underlying divorce judgment (see Clark v Clark, 33 AD3d 836 [2006]).

The father’s remaining contentions are without merit. Spolzino, J.P., Krausman, Skelos and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 A.D.3d 757, 833 N.Y.S.2d 910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gulotta-v-gulotta-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack