Gullo v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gullo v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles

66 A.D.2d 873, 411 N.Y.S.2d 662, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14218

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 29, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 66 A.D.2d 873 (Gullo v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gullo v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, 66 A.D.2d 873, 411 N.Y.S.2d 662, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14218 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of respondent New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, dated December 20, 1977, which, after a hearing, revoked the license and driving privileges of the petitioner. Determination confirmed, [874]*874with costs, and proceeding dismissed on the merits. There was substantial evidence in the record to support the determination. We note that the documents which were a part of the record were authenticated by a duly designated officer of the Department of Motor Vehicles who had custody of them and, as such, were properly used to support the determination reached. Shapiro, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and O'Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of respondent New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, dated December 20, 1977, which, after a hearing, revoked the license and driving privileges of the petitioner. Determination confirmed, [874]*874with costs, and proceeding dismissed on the merits. There was substantial evidence in the record to support the determination. We note that the documents which were a part of the record were authenticated by a duly designated officer of the Department of Motor Vehicles who had custody of them and, as such, were properly used to support the determination reached. Shapiro, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and O'Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 A.D.2d 873, 411 N.Y.S.2d 662, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gullo-v-new-york-state-department-of-motor-vehicles-nyappdiv-1978.