Gullo v. Gullo

46 A.D.2d 992, 363 N.Y.S.2d 809
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gullo v. Gullo. Read the opinion of the Court — 46 A.D.2d 991
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 5, 1974·No. Appeal No. 3·Published

Opinion

—• Order unanimously reversed and application remitted to Special Term, Erie County for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Plaintiff applied to Special Term for an allowance for counsel fees in connection with her appeal from a divorce judgment entered against her in favor of the defendant. Special Term denied her application on the ground that she failed to show reasonable probability of success. However, she has succeeded (see Gullo v. Gullo, 46 A D 2d 991). Consequently, the application is remitted to Special Term for consideration in light of what has since transpired. (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term on motion for payment of expenses and counsel fees on appeal.) Present — Marsh, P. J., Witmer, Moule, Simons and Del Vecchio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gullo v. Gullo, 46 A.D.2d 992, 363 N.Y.S.2d 809 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

46 A.D.2d 992 (Gullo v. Gullo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.