Gulliver Schools, Inc. v. Snay

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gulliver Schools, Inc. v. Snay

137 So. 3d 1031, 2013 WL 5676688, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16108

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gulliver Schools, Inc. v. Snay. Read the opinion of the Court — 137 So. 3d 1045 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 10, 2013·No. No. 3D13-1952·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION TO FILE BRIEFS AND APPENDICES UNDER SEAL

SUAREZ, J.

Gulliver Schools, Inc. and School Management Systems, Inc.’s Amended Motion to File Briefs and Appendices Under Seal is facially insufficient. We. therefore deny the motion without prejudice to file a motion to seal that complies with the test for sealing of court proceedings and records set forth in Barron v. Fla. Freedom Newspapers, 531 So.2d 113 (Fla.1988). See Fla. R.J. Admin. 2.420; BDO Seidman, LLP v. Banco Espirito Santo Int% Ltd., — So.3d — (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON MOTION TO FILE BRIEFS AND APPENDICES UNDER SEAL

SUAREZ, J.

Gulliver Schools, Inc. and School Management Systems, Inc.’s Amended Motion to File Briefs and Appendices Under Seal is facially insufficient. We. therefore deny the motion without prejudice to file a motion to seal that complies with the test for sealing of court proceedings and records set forth in Barron v. Fla. Freedom Newspapers, 531 So.2d 113 (Fla.1988). See Fla. R.J. Admin. 2.420; BDO Seidman, LLP v. Banco Espirito Santo Int% Ltd., — So.3d — (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).

Gulliver Schools, Inc. v. Snay, 137 So. 3d 1031, 2013 WL 5676688, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16108 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

137 So. 3d 1031 (Gulliver Schools, Inc. v. Snay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related