Gullickson v. Southwest Airlines

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided July 2, 1996·No. 95-4155·Published

Opinion

ATTACHMENT NOT AVAILABLE ELECTRONICALLY PUBLISH

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 7/2/96 TENTH CIRCUIT

JEFF GULLICKSON, THOMAS A. MOSHER, CHARLES M. MOTZ, JR., MICHAEL PRATT, GERALD PUCKETT, GARY JOSEPH SALLEE, GARY WINN, Individually, and as representatives of a class of all Morris Air Pilots; COREY HOLBERG and ROBERT R. MAY, II.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. No. 95-4155

SOUTHWEST AIRLINES PILOT’S ASSOCIATION, SOUTHWEST AIRLINES COMPANY and MORRIS AIR CORPORATION,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Utah (D.C. No. 94-CV-660)

Daniel M. Katz (Louise P. Zanar with him on the brief), of Katz & Ranzman, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Plaintiffs-Appellants..

J. Joe Harris, Matthews & Branscomb, San Antonio, TX, and Marvin Menaker, Dallas, TX, for Defendants-Appellees.. Before HENRY, MURPHY, and LIVELY *, Circuit Judges.

MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

After careful review of the record, we adopt the analysis of the district court’s

Memorandum Decision and Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial

Summary Judgment, Granting in Part Defendants’ Motions for Summary

Judgment, and Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification. We therefore

AFFIRM for substantially the reasons given by the district court and ORDER the

district court’s memorandum decision and order to be published.

Attachment

* Of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gullickson v. Southwest Airlines, (10th Cir. 1996).

Gullickson v. Southwest Airlines (Gullickson v. Southwest Airlines) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.