Gulley v. Gulley

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gulley v. Gulley

614 So. 2d 13, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2101, 1993 WL 36310

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 16, 1993

DocketNo. 92-3498

StatusPublished

This text of 614 So. 2d 13 (Gulley v. Gulley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gulley v. Gulley, 614 So. 2d 13, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2101, 1993 WL 36310 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

KAHN, Judge.

Debra K. Gulley appeals a Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage on the basis that the trial court abused its discretion in finding that Bobby Gulley should be the primary residential parent of the parties’ two minor daughters. In finding that Mr. Gulley should be the primary residential parent, the trial court allowed for a six month period of observation and ordered the parties to appear before it on February 19, 1993 for a hearing so that it “may assess the childrens' welfare and make any modifications or changes with regard to their residence or visitation as may then appear necessary.” The trial court implicitly recognized that both parties are well-qualified to serve as primary residential parent. Mrs. Gulley has not demonstrated abuse of discretion in the finding that Mr. Gulley should be the primary residential parent.

AFFIRMED.

ZEHMER and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KAHN, Judge.

Debra K. Gulley appeals a Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage on the basis that the trial court abused its discretion in finding that Bobby Gulley should be the primary residential parent of the parties’ two minor daughters. In finding that Mr. Gulley should be the primary residential parent, the trial court allowed for a six month period of observation and ordered the parties to appear before it on February 19, 1993 for a hearing so that it “may assess the childrens' welfare and make any modifications or changes with regard to their residence or visitation as may then appear necessary.” The trial court implicitly recognized that both parties are well-qualified to serve as primary residential parent. Mrs. Gulley has not demonstrated abuse of discretion in the finding that Mr. Gulley should be the primary residential parent.

AFFIRMED.

ZEHMER and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

614 So. 2d 13, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2101, 1993 WL 36310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gulley-v-gulley-fladistctapp-1993.