Gulley v. . Cole

9 S.E. 196, 102 N.C. 333
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 5, 1889·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Mebbjmox, J.

(after stating the case). The Court .properly decided that the attempt to value and lay off the homestead of the defendant in the same land a second time was void — not upon the ground upon which the Court based its judgment, but because the homestead, as at first laid off, was effectual, continued to be so, and could not be disturbed by a re-valuation thereof and laying it off a second time. This Court so expressly decided in the defendants appeal in this case. Gulley v. Cole, 96 N. C., 447. That case is conclusive of this, and we need not do more than cite it.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gulley v. . Cole, 9 S.E. 196, 102 N.C. 333 (N.C. 1889).

9 S.E. 196 (Gulley v. . Cole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vanstory v. . Thornton
14 S.E. 637 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1892)
Aiken v. . Gardner
12 S.E. 250 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1890)
Thornton v. . Vanstory
12 S.E. 203 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1890)