Gulley v. . Cole

9 S.E. 196, 102 N.C. 333
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedFebruary 5, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 9 S.E. 196 (Gulley v. . Cole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gulley v. . Cole, 9 S.E. 196, 102 N.C. 333 (N.C. 1889).

Opinion

Mebbjmox, J.

(after stating the case). The Court .properly decided that the attempt to value and lay off the homestead of the defendant in the same land a second time was void — not upon the ground upon which the Court based its judgment, but because the homestead, as at first laid off, was effectual, continued to be so, and could not be disturbed by a re-valuation thereof and laying it off a second time. This Court so expressly decided in the defendants appeal in this case. Gulley v. Cole, 96 N. C., 447. That case is conclusive of this, and we need not do more than cite it.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vanstory v. . Thornton
14 S.E. 637 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1892)
Aiken v. . Gardner
12 S.E. 250 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1890)
Thornton v. . Vanstory
12 S.E. 203 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1890)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 S.E. 196, 102 N.C. 333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gulley-v-cole-nc-1889.