Gullat & Scott v. Tucker

11 F. Cas. 111, 2 D.C. 33, 2 Cranch 33

This text of 11 F. Cas. 111 (Gullat & Scott v. Tucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gullat & Scott v. Tucker, 11 F. Cas. 111, 2 D.C. 33, 2 Cranch 33 (circtddc 1811).

Opinion

The CouRT

instructed the jury that, if they believed from the evidence that Tucker, at the time he sold and delivered the groceries to Gullat, knew that they were for his separate use, he had no right to charge them to the firm without the assent of Scott. It would be a collusion. Bond v. Gibson Sf Jephson, Camp. N. P. Rep. 185.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 F. Cas. 111, 2 D.C. 33, 2 Cranch 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gullat-scott-v-tucker-circtddc-1811.