Gull Steel Corp. v. Ro Contracting Corp.

135 A.D.2d 680, 523 N.Y.S.2d 25, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52625

This text of 135 A.D.2d 680 (Gull Steel Corp. v. Ro Contracting Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gull Steel Corp. v. Ro Contracting Corp., 135 A.D.2d 680, 523 N.Y.S.2d 25, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52625 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

— Appeal by the plaintiff from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated December 3, 1986, as denied those branches of its motion which were to amend the complaint insofar as it is asserted against the defendants Lamar Lighting Co. Inc., Kugel and Goldstein on the ground that the proposed amended complaint failed to state a cause of action against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Harwood at the Supreme Court. Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Bracken and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 A.D.2d 680, 523 N.Y.S.2d 25, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gull-steel-corp-v-ro-contracting-corp-nyappdiv-1987.