Gull Steel Corp. v. Ro Contracting Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gull Steel Corp. v. Ro Contracting Corp.

135 A.D.2d 680, 523 N.Y.S.2d 25, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52625

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 21, 1987·Published

Opinion

— Appeal by the plaintiff from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated December 3, 1986, as denied those branches of its motion which were to amend the complaint insofar as it is asserted against the defendants Lamar Lighting Co. Inc., Kugel and Goldstein on the ground that the proposed amended complaint failed to state a cause of action against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Harwood at the Supreme Court. Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Bracken and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the plaintiff from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated December 3, 1986, as denied those branches of its motion which were to amend the complaint insofar as it is asserted against the defendants Lamar Lighting Co. Inc., Kugel and Goldstein on the ground that the proposed amended complaint failed to state a cause of action against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Harwood at the Supreme Court. Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Bracken and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Gull Steel Corp. v. Ro Contracting Corp., 135 A.D.2d 680, 523 N.Y.S.2d 25, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52625 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

135 A.D.2d 680 (Gull Steel Corp. v. Ro Contracting Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.