Gulick v. Golder

178 P. 617, 104 Kan. 170, 1919 Kan. LEXIS 213
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedFebruary 8, 1919
DocketNo. 21,611
StatusPublished

This text of 178 P. 617 (Gulick v. Golder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gulick v. Golder, 178 P. 617, 104 Kan. 170, 1919 Kan. LEXIS 213 (kan 1919).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

This action was brought by the heirs at law of John C. Golder to impeach his will on the ground that it was made when he was of unsound mind, and without testamentary capacity. After a large number of witnesses had testified pro and con as to his mental condition, the court found that at the time he made his will he was of sound and disposing mind.

The plaintiffs rested their case on the proposition that, while in a general way he was of sound mind, he was laboring under an insane delusion that his son-in-law had put poison in the eyewater which he was using, and that actuated by such delusion he changed his will so as to give the daughter one thousand dollars instead of two eighty-acre tracts of land.

The court was requested to find that the testator was thus influenced to change his will, but made only a general finding thát when he made the last will he was of sound and disposing mind.

[171]*171While from the cloud of witnesses much testimony was received which would have supported the finding requested, the trial court was not convinced thereby, and the question of the alleged delusion being one of fact, the conclusion of the trial court must stand, supported as it is by the testimony of numerous witnesses.

While the writer feels convinced that the plaintiff’s assertion was sustained, the other members of the court hold the contrary view. This makes it unnecessary to refer to the authorities cited, or to quote any of the evidence.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
178 P. 617, 104 Kan. 170, 1919 Kan. LEXIS 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gulick-v-golder-kan-1919.