Gulf & Western Industries, Inc. v. United States

655 F.2d 1106, 29 Cont. Cas. Fed. 81,995, 1981 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 1467
United States Court of Claims·Decided August 4, 1981·No. No. 384-77·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

This matter comes before the court on plaintiff’s motion for relief from judgment, awarded defendant in our opinion of December 17, 1980, 226 Ct.Cl. -, 639 F.2d 732, on the ground that plaintiff believes it was denied due process because of the appearance of bias and prejudice on the part of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals Administrative Law Judge in reaching his appealed-from decision.

Subsequent to the date of our per curiam opinion herein, plaintiff was advised by the Department of Justice of ex parte communications to Government counsel from, and initiated by, the same administrative law judge, regarding another case (docket No. 65-80C) involving a different claim by this plaintiff. There is no charge of any attempted ex parte communication in the instant case, nor is there evidence of any. Nevertheless, because of the co-pending status of the two actions, and the appearance of potential bias and prejudice,

IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion is granted to the extent that the judgment [1107] of the court, dated December 17, 1980, is vacated. The case is remanded to the trial division of this court for a de novo determination and report by a trial judge, based on a preponderance of the evidence in the existing administrative record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gulf & Western Industries, Inc. v. United States, 655 F.2d 1106, 29 Cont. Cas. Fed. 81,995, 1981 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 1467 (cc 1981).

655 F.2d 1106 (Gulf & Western Industries, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gulf & Western Industries, Inc. v. United States
32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 73,100 (Court of Claims, 1984)