Gulf Stream Motors, Inc. v. Cook

223 So. 2d 713, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2292
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 18, 1969
DocketNo. 38480
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 223 So. 2d 713 (Gulf Stream Motors, Inc. v. Cook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gulf Stream Motors, Inc. v. Cook, 223 So. 2d 713, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2292 (Fla. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition and cross-petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission hearing date March 6, 1969.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petitions, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petitions are therefore denied.

The petition for allowance of an attorney’s fee is hereby granted in the amount of $250.00.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, CARLTON and BOYD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shingleton v. Bussey
223 So. 2d 713 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
223 So. 2d 713, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gulf-stream-motors-inc-v-cook-fla-1969.