Gulf Stream Boat Builders, Inc. v. South Dade Boat, Inc.

583 So. 2d 807, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8319, 1991 WL 152953
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 13, 1991·No. No. 90-1852·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s denial of a motion to set aside default. Plaintiff misled defendants into believing it was unnecessary to file any responsive pleadings because of ongoing settlement negotiations. Thus, it was unconscionable for plaintiff to take advantage of defendants’ failure to file an answer by obtaining a default judgment without notice to defendants. American Republic Ins. Co. v. Westchester Gen. Hosp., 414 So.2d 1163 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Rubenstein v. Richard Fidlin Corp., 346 So.2d 89 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gulf Stream Boat Builders, Inc. v. South Dade Boat, Inc., 583 So. 2d 807, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8319, 1991 WL 152953 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

583 So. 2d 807 (Gulf Stream Boat Builders, Inc. v. South Dade Boat, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Highsmith, Highsmith v. Britten
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2025
Jostens Learning Corp. v. Education System Corp. of Indiana
651 N.E.2d 1186 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1995)