Gulf States Tube Division of Quanex Corp. v. United States

22 Ct. Int'l Trade 137, 990 F. Supp. 834, 22 C.I.T. 137, 20 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1319, 1998 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 17
CourtUnited States Court of International Trade
DecidedMarch 10, 1998
DocketConsolidated Court No. 95-09-01125
StatusPublished

This text of 22 Ct. Int'l Trade 137 (Gulf States Tube Division of Quanex Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of International Trade primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gulf States Tube Division of Quanex Corp. v. United States, 22 Ct. Int'l Trade 137, 990 F. Supp. 834, 22 C.I.T. 137, 20 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1319, 1998 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 17 (cit 1998).

Opinion

JUDGMENT ORDER

Wallach, Judge:

On August 29,1997, this Court remanded to the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration, one issue arising from Commerce’s determination in Small Diameter Circular Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel, Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe from Italy, 60 Fed. Reg. 31,981 (June 19, 1995). At the request of Commerce, the Court remanded this case to Commerce to recalculate the cost of production (“COP”) and constructed value (“CV”) for the galvanized pipe produced by Dalmine Tubi Industriad S.r.l. (“DTI”). Com[138]*138merce complied with the Court’s remand order and filed its remand results on November 28, 1997. See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant To Court Remand: Gulf States Tube v. The United States, Slip. Op. 97-124 (August 29,1997), [Consol.] Ct. No. 95-09-01125 (“Results of Redetermination ”).

Pursuant to the telephonic conference held this day with Plaintiff, Gulf States Tube Division of Quanex Corporation, appearing by and through Roger Schagrin, Esq., of Schagrin Associates, Defendants, the United States and the United States Department of Commerce, appearing by and through Velta Melnbrencis, Esq., and Defendant-Interve-nors, Dalmine, S.p.A., DalmineUSAInc., and TAD USA, Inc., appearing by and through Doug Heffner, Esq., of Rogers & Wells; the Court having reviewed the pleadings and papers on file herein, no parties intendingto file comments on Commerce’s Results of Redetermination, and good cause appearing therefor, it is hereby

Ordered adjudged and decreed thatth e Results of Redetermination are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 Ct. Int'l Trade 137, 990 F. Supp. 834, 22 C.I.T. 137, 20 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1319, 1998 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gulf-states-tube-division-of-quanex-corp-v-united-states-cit-1998.