Gulf States Marine & Mining Company v. State Road Department of Florida

269 F.2d 83, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3422
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 12, 1959·No. 17692_1·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

Submitted to the court without a jury on depositions and stipulations, the suit was for damages to plaintiff’s bridge.

Appealing from a judgment finding and adjudging it liable, defendant is here insisting that the district judge’s findings, that the defendant was, and the plaintiff was not, guilty of negligence, are clearly erroneous and the judgment must, therefore, be reversed.

We cannot agree that this is so. In his careful opinion, 1 the district judge canvassed the evidence on the tendered issues of defendant’s fault and plaintiff’s contributory negligence and, with ample support in the evidence, rejected both of defendant’s contentions and found liability.

The judgment is, therefore,

Affirmed.

1

. State Road Dept. of Florida v. Gulf States Marine & Mining Co., D.C., 168 F.Supp. 242.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gulf States Marine & Mining Company v. State Road Department of Florida, 269 F.2d 83, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3422 (5th Cir. 1959).

269 F.2d 83 (Gulf States Marine & Mining Company v. State Road Department of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. M/V Ciudad De Turbo
330 F. Supp. 769 (S.D. Alabama, 1971)
Sabine Towing & Transportation Co. v. St. Joe Paper Co.
297 F. Supp. 748 (N.D. Florida, 1968)
Kansas City Bridge Co. v. The M/V Ole Miss
215 F. Supp. 658 (N.D. Mississippi, 1963)
Greenville Gravel Co. v. Illinois Farm Supply
215 F. Supp. 560 (N.D. Mississippi, 1963)